| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| nudinono |
Posted - 10/26/2003 : 2:41:40 PM
Is it possible for a (married/single)nudist male to have a platonic relationship with a female nudist (married/single)??????? It is possible here;but for real ?  Webster's dictionary--platonic,pretaining to Plato the Greek philosopher,or his philosophy. pure and untainted with carnal desires. |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Spontanudity |
Posted - 11/23/2003 : 5:22:24 PM
I think the difference is that both party consents to swinging whereas adultery is the case where one party is unaware of the others activities.
I'm curious as to why you think being nude would "open up more opportunities". I definitely disagree with you, subscribing to that line of thinking only moves nudity closer to sex.
Cheers,
Spontanudity
"Forever Naked"
http://groups.msn.com/YoungSydneyNaturists |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/23/2003 : 04:57:12 AM
Adultry is adultry where you are sneaking or swinging. Reminds me of the interview someone had with Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy was asked what the difference was between adultry and fornication. Jimmy thought for a moment and said, "I have tried them both, buth could never tell a difference." I would assume that being nude would up open up more oportunities to find another partner, but I am not sure what the incidence would be.
Kim =^.^= |
| Spontanudity |
Posted - 11/22/2003 : 7:59:36 PM
I'm guessing it would depend on how you defined adultery. I'm sure there are plenty of swingers who claim they are nudists, this would probably suggest that there is probably a higher incidence of adutltery than in a non-nudist relationship.
Cheers,
Spontanudity
"Forever Naked"
http://groups.msn.com/YoungSydneyNaturists |
| irishred |
Posted - 11/22/2003 : 09:50:48 AM
Sponta, that would be an interesting study.
irishred |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/22/2003 : 04:34:13 AM
That would be an interesting study Spontanudity. I have my own preconcieved notions, but I would like to see an actual study to confirm them.
Kim =^.^= |
| Spontanudity |
Posted - 11/21/2003 : 9:26:59 PM
Cheef,
I agree with you but I'm not sure where you're coming from with the pre-maritial sex argument. The whole concept of abstainance is outdated and beyond me that its even considered an issue. Providing there are two consenting adults involved I believe there is nothing wrong with them choosing to have partake in a sexual relationship.
I would, however, be interested to see whether there is a lower incidence of adultery in naturist relationships than non-naturist.
Cheers,
Spontanudity
"Forever Naked"
http://groups.msn.com/YoungSydneyNaturists |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/20/2003 : 12:01:06 AM
Cheef you hit the nail on the head. The reason I feel comfortable in going nude at a club or beach is that I know I am not going to have sex. There is nothing sexual in being nude with your friends and having fun. Everyone knows the boundaries so there are no problems.
Kim =^.^= |
| cheef |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 8:57:24 PM
I think the issue of Platonic relationships between men and women is the same among nudists as it is among non-nudists. For some people it can happen, for others it's more difficult.
As far as pre-marital sex among nudists, older studies showed that it was actually much less common for nudists to have had sex outside of marriage. Of course, when those studies were done, nudists were a more conservative lot on average than they are now.
My personal thought on the matter is that if you set boundaries and adhere to them, there is no greater likelihood of trouble when nude than when clothed.
I've often had friends who ask about how I can not get sexually excited by the mere presence of nude women. I ask a question or two which helps them realize that the reason nudity gets them excited is the possibility of sex. However, because that was never an option, there was not a problem.
http://cheef.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nudist-news-group/ |
| rockinghorse61 |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 7:23:10 PM
Kim,
I don't know about the self-conscious part if they are showing so much already. |
| Spontanudity |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 06:00:40 AM
That's an interesting concept... Has anybody here had there partner ask you not to be a nudist?
Cheers,
Spontanudity
"Forever Naked"
http://groups.msn.com/YoungSydneyNaturists |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 05:28:18 AM
rockinghorse I am sure they do. Either they feel self concious about their bodies, or they are voyeurs, or possibly their boy friends/husbands will not let them.
Kim =^.^=
|
| rockinghorse61 |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 04:04:04 AM
I tend to ingore the gawkers. They know where they are, and if they want to look, let them. I do note female gawkers that wear two piece swim suits, the top piece covering half of their breasts, the bottom piece two inches below their belly buttons. My guess--do they secretly wish they could take them off and join us? |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/19/2003 : 02:03:12 AM
Spontanudy;
I was more nervous at the beach the first time because not everyone was nude. There were some gawkers there looking at me and it made feel uncomfortable. After a couple more times visiting the beach I got to the point where it didn't bother me anymore.
Kim =^.^= |
| Spontanudity |
Posted - 11/18/2003 : 07:44:07 AM
Kim,
What was your first nude beach experience like? I figure a beach is slightly different from a resorts as there are less social controls.
Cheers,
Spontanudity
"Forever Naked"
http://groups.msn.com/YoungSydneyNaturists |
| Kimberly |
Posted - 11/16/2003 : 01:48:03 AM
I agree, nudists are more friendly at a beach or even the club. My first experience with nudism was at a club. It was the warm friendly atmosphere of nudists that won me over to nudism.
Kim =^.^= |
