| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| nudesunguy |
Posted - 04/30/2012 : 11:11:19 AM
The world has changed; EVERYONE now has a cell phone and most are capable of taking photos. Is it really possible/realistic to ban cell phones in all nudist environments? Should the management of resorts request/demand that all patrons surrender their phones when they check in? And I guess this would also include ipods, etc. since many of those now have cameras also. Where does it end?
Discuss...
|
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| nudesunguy |
Posted - 05/25/2012 : 10:14:19 AM
Good point; wearing the large, currently fashionable, sunglasses and a hat pretty much makes one anonymous. Still, very few people like to be photographed without their permission—but there is no law to stop it, only civility.
|
| Warmskin |
Posted - 05/23/2012 : 01:45:28 AM
At a c/o beach, I wear a baseball style hat and shades. Quite difficult to identify someone that way, if you're taking his photo without permission. I do like my privacy when there is not a universal nudist group-minded protocol.
“I rise early almost every morning and sit in my chamber, without any clothes whatever, half an hour or an hour, according to the season, either reading or writing.”
Ben Franklin
|
| ColoradoGuy |
Posted - 05/22/2012 : 10:07:03 PM
I'd prefer not to be photographed, but then if I am in public it might happen. If you join the World Naked Bike Ride it definitely will happen. At least you are doing something you believe in.
Colorado Guy |
| jbsnc |
Posted - 05/06/2012 : 07:56:50 AM
The nudist resort I most often visit is comparatively a very safe place. Almost as safe as Japan. In Japan we lived within a few hundred yards (OK, meters) of the prefectural prison in tottori-ken. Big prison, small number of prisoners, less by far, far than the many blacks coming from fatherless homes in Durham, NC who have little chance at life. If interested, read Rushton's 'Race, Evolution, and Behavior.' Food for thought.
Happy Nuding. |
| Diger |
Posted - 05/05/2012 : 8:30:39 PM
I agree guys anytime you draw attention to the creeps they run for cover. I have never put a camera in someone's face but I have been a couple faces before and after you draw some attention to them they don't stay around long.
Diger |
| steady78 |
Posted - 05/05/2012 : 12:01:20 PM
AGDE , that's a great idea! And Bill , I've pointed the camera phone at a greepy guy once and it very quickly had the desired effect ! |
| agde |
Posted - 05/05/2012 : 02:38:14 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Bowser
I've heard that if you start pointing cameras at the creeps they don't like it and disappear.
It would be easy enough to setup a "CreepsAtTheBeach" on Facebook or Tumblr to undo their anonymity... |
| Bill Bowser |
Posted - 05/04/2012 : 11:19:56 PM
I've heard that if you start pointing cameras at the creeps they don't like it and disappear.
Bill Bowser - Cincinnati
Nudists are everywhere, but they're hard to identify with their clothes on. |
| Nudony |
Posted - 05/04/2012 : 11:54:12 AM
What I've seen over the past few years is the emergence of the "unapologetic voyeur." These are the guys that if confronted, will boldly and arrogantly defend their position as being in "public domain" or knowing their "rights." Some of them don't even try to hide the fact they are filming you. Then, the only recourse left is physical threat or verbal abuse...because of the attention they are suddenly getting from the surrounding nudist crowd - and the discomfort it creates for them. It's a sad state of affairs. It actually happened right next to me last summer at Mazo; this guy suddenly got accosted by a couple of nudists - he had a mini-cam on him and had been filming/capturing nearby nudists. And I was sitting right next to him and never realized he was doing that. Creepy.
I don't really have any answers for this relatively new - and growing - issue. A couple of suggestions, perhaps. If you're going to go to the CO beach and are leery of being "cam'd", choose a relatively isolated side of the beach. You'll be able to see voyeurs coming from a mile away. Some nudists bring tents or shades; it's very hard for a voyeur to get a good angle with a shade in the way. Me, I've just accepted the fact that I could be filmed while at Mazo; it doesn't bother me a great deal.
At the resort, it's a little more difficult to conceal a recording device if it's a nude resort or has nude-only areas. Someone who walks everywhere with a towel wrapped under his armpit or a small bag/pouch probably deserves a little extra attention. It's better to report someone suspicious - even if it turns out to be unwarranted - than end up in a situation where you're grabbing someone by the neck for filming your wife.
Just be attentive - without being paranoid. Because at the end of the day it 's just a couple of nude pictures...not really worth a court case or being banned from your resort.
|
| nudesunguy |
Posted - 05/04/2012 : 11:32:32 AM
Yes, public beaches are another issue. We caught someone filming our daughter. We contacted the police and ran him off. The cops came and examined his camera (he had managed to throw away the SD card during the chase). The police then informed us that there is not much they could have done even if they had found the video, since what he did was not illegal: filming people on a public beach. Most people who do this are sheepish wimps who are easily intimidated, but you will encounter them from time to time.
Reminds me of the tour bus that stops at Pedro's in St. Martin. The tourists get out and film the crazy nudists, then get back into the bus and have it take them to what they are told is the next attraction. I actually feel sorry for them and their lives.
|
| blavan |
Posted - 05/04/2012 : 10:25:56 AM
This is why we no longer visit clothing optional beaches. We were at Sandy Hook, a nudist beach in New Jersey several years ago in the 90's and two clothed guys were photographing nudists without permission. We asked them to stop and actually chased them when they refused. Since they were clothed with shoes on, they were able to run faster in the sand than we could. They got away to the parking lot where nudity is not allowed.
We cringed that some creepy people with unknown intentions had naked photos of us and there was nothing we could do about it.
We did visit Haulover Beach in Florida several times after that but there were so many clothed gawkers there that we seldom go there either. We now prefer only nudist clubs, private gatherings and resorts. There is less chance of our pictures being taken by anyone without our permission.
Being Naked and Being Real |
| Admin |
Posted - 05/03/2012 : 11:31:28 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Knows
1. A well designed app would be transmitting the video to an off site location and not saving it in memory.
This app leaves no chance you'd be caught while your phone is trying to upload a video, which would prevent it from being deleted in time.
I understand your thinking, and I was surprised they took this choice in the design, but when you think about it, if you want absolute stealth, one bailout word and everything is clean as a whistle. |
| Bob Knows |
Posted - 05/03/2012 : 1:01:02 PM
1. A well designed app would be transmitting the video to an off site location and not saving it in memory.
2. Texting is obviously rude. Texting should be banned in polite company. Faking it is worse.
3. Clothed by the nude hot tub is wrong. That's enough to run someone off.
4. Starting a fight is not good either.
5. Cameras are ubiquetous in every device from watches to phones, computer, tablets, book readers, etc., not counting small obscure "spy" cameras. And that doesn't even count the millions of "security" cameras we ignore by habit. Anyone who thinks they aren't being photographed frequently everywhere they go is naieve.
6. The guy in this story could not have been more obvious if he had tried. Most of the time someone won't be so obvous.
7. Being naked is not a crime, nor even bad. Being seen naked does not hurt. It really doesn't.
|
| nudesunguy |
Posted - 05/03/2012 : 11:16:46 AM
Now this is a case where I think any person who is fully clothed next to a hot tub pointing a phone at people is behaving in a rude way and should be called on it, even if they are just "texting." On the other hand, a mother sitting nude at a pool and talking on her phone to her child should be perfectly fine. It's common sense really, and a better policy than to ban all electronics. I realize the management can't be watching all people at all times, but nudists are very good at self-policing and reporting violators. I've seen more than one guy escorted off a resort for undesirable behavior.
|
| Admin |
Posted - 05/03/2012 : 02:09:09 AM
I'll share with you an incident we experienced at a popular nudist hot tub some time ago.
There was one single male hovering over the hot tub with his cell phone. For some reason, he looked suspicious that he needed to be standing, fully clothed, right at the edge of the hot tub, with his phone pointing right at the nude patrons in the water. He appeared to be making an obvious show of texting on his phone. I watched him.
After a few minutes, he moved over to another group of folks and did exactly the same thing. At this point I warned the people in my group to help me keep an eye on him.
Then, he stepped over to our area and stood directly over us, pointing his phone (while texting) right at my friend's attractive wife. My friend loudly told him to back off, and stop pointing his phone at us. He refused, saying he was just texting. He continued to finger the phone as my friend escalated his warning.
What ensued was ugly.
When my friend threw some water on him to get him to back off (which security later explained was assault and battery, and a good reason to arrest my friend) the phone guy went into a rage and threatened grave bodily harm to the husband. As he threw his dinner jacket and phone to the pavement, I had to run to get security.
Here's the interesting part.
When security arrived, and we explained his pattern of behavior, security escorted him off the premises. All the time he was loudly exclaiming that he was just texting, that's all.
Later that night, security told us there was nothing they could find on his phone, and that we were in the wrong to harass this gentleman. The resulting protest from the husband nearly got him arrested for the earlier alleged assault and battery (splashing the water).
Security was angry and embarrassed that they had had to act, and had found nothing. Tempers were high.
I later found out what was really happening.
When the phone guy stood over the hot tub, he opened a certain app, easily available for free on android. This opened a text window, where he typed any gibberish that would pass as harmless texting. Somewhere in the text, he used his first pre-programmed code word, which started the phone's video recorder, while suppressing any outward indication of the recorder being activated. He continued to fake his texting, while collecting video of his subjects.
By using another pre-arranged code word while typing, the recorder was turned off, and the video saved to memory.
Changing his location, he repeated the process.
When my friend called him out, he became angry because he was forced to use his bailout word, which erased all the videos he had just recorded. Of course, when the clueless security personnel checked the phone, there was nothing out of the ordinary. They couldn't fathom that there could be a covert app designed for that purpose. The perpetrator just continued to yell that he was only texting, only texting. Security let him go his way, with nothing to use as evidence of wrongdoing.
Nope. It's not science fiction. I wish it was. I found that particular app, and I have it installed on my phone right now. It is designed to entirely hide its real purpose. A second stealth mode can be used without the texting function. It just makes the phone appear to be entirely off, all lights and screen black. But it is recording video the entire time. You have to know which buttons to push to shut it off, and no one can tell, even if you hand the phone over to them for inspection. It just looks like a dead phone, while recording the entire time.
Yes, it's that evil.
Or-- perhaps this guy was just texting.
The only way to know for sure is if the perpetrator behaves 100% consistently with this pattern. And on his phone you'll see an icon very similar to our edit button  . The actual icon has a thinner, longer, green pencil aiming up and to the left. Even the name of the app can be altered, in case there is a group, like you folks, that have learned to recognize this tactic. |
|
|
