Nudist-Resorts.Org - Naturist Discussion Forum / Bulletin Board


Nudist-Resorts.Org - Naturist Discussion Forum / Bulletin Board
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Register
Forgot Password?

About Us | Active Topics | Active Polls | Site News | Nudist News | Online Users | Members | Destinations | N. A. I. R. | My Page | Search
[ Active Members: 0 | Anonymous Members: 0 | Guests: 316 ]  [ Total: 316 ]  [ Newest Member: Sthrnyankee ]
 All Forums
 General Discussion - Everything Else
 General discussion. Post anything off-topic here.
 Clothes with less coverage for a positive image
Next Page
 New Topic |   Reply to Topic |   Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic: Catholicism and nudism Topic Next Topic: No Topic Needed - Just Chatting - November 2007
Page: of 2

iamanudist
New Member

Posted - 08/14/2006 :  12:53:23 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Clothes with less coverage for a positive image

Edited by - iamanudist on 10/04/2007 1:37:39 PM

Country: | Posts: 6

openess
Forum Member

Posted - 08/14/2006 :  06:11:03 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Certainly promoting a positive image is a good thing, but I disagree with your course of action on two counts: 1. Encouraging your daugther to be scantily clad in a culture where most members have successfully (like it or not) been conditioned to associate skin with sexuality could subject her to unpleasant and unwanted attention, and possibly danger. 2. People should come to naturism naturally, of their own free will. Your methods suggest some level of coercion has been applied. Let her find her own way on her own schedule following the guidance of her own heart.


Edited by - openess on 08/14/2006 06:13:33 AM

Country: USA | Posts: 83 Go to Top of Page

Cheri
Forum Member


Posted - 08/14/2006 :  08:31:23 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It's definitely exhibitionism and definitely NOT nudism when one is scantily clad.
Cheri

Doing what I can to positively promote nudism
-
-



Country: USA | Posts: 3519 Go to Top of Page

NaturistDoc
Forum Member


Posted - 08/14/2006 :  09:05:06 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
This whole discussion seems highly bogus from the get-go. We're supposed to believe that "Martha's" rule for her daughter is: dress like a ho, or get kicked out of the house? Please. "Martha" writes more like a porn-happy middle-aged guy than a mother of an 18 year old daughter. I"m not buying it.


Country: USA | Posts: 1054 Go to Top of Page

nurserobin
Forum Member

Posted - 08/14/2006 :  09:24:51 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm with you Doc - especially if "Martha" has read any of the forums previous to this - scantily clad = sexual in our culture and she would have figured this out before posting that she's sending her 18 year old out in the world as a potential victim from advertising her sexual message via dressing to attract men. On a date with a short skirt and no underwear and she's happy about it? Please....


Country: USA | Posts: 131 Go to Top of Page

FireProf
Forum Member


Posted - 08/14/2006 :  9:15:33 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Count the Fireman and the Professor (now also a Doctor) in with the good Doctor and Nurse!

The initial post smells too fishy for us!



Country: USA | Posts: 3175 Go to Top of Page

Rodders
Forum Member


Posted - 08/15/2006 :  03:48:16 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It really does stretch the imagination to believe that an eighteen year old WOMAN would allow herself to be dictated to house rules that enforce her to go out wearing mid-thigh length skirts without underwear. Short skirts ride up (delightfully) when the wearer sits down and so this girl is constantly risking flashing her pudenda when taking a seat, getting out of cars walking upstairs, walking down the street in a stiff breeze and other normal everyday activities. We as nudists are used to seeing the entire body but dressing like this with quite healthy, predatory young males about is risking the kind of attention no woman regardless of age need expose herself to. Yes, women do go without any underwear but for reasons of comfort not just to ensure the very minimum of coverage to the body, which in this case clearly means the pubic area. All smacks of male masturbatory daydreams to me. So, Martha if you are genuine you certainly are radical and given the current social climate, your daughter is either a pioneer or taking unnecessary risks. I assume that you enjoy doing the same?

Rod



Country: United Kingdom | Posts: 170 Go to Top of Page

bornnude
Forum Member


Posted - 08/15/2006 :  06:55:42 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
And here I was thinking this was "only" an abusive situation for the daughter to be in.



Country: USA | Posts: 462 Go to Top of Page

JustJim
Forum Member


Posted - 08/15/2006 :  07:36:39 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The one thing that drives me nuts on this forum (and I enjoy most of it so I'm not being negative) is that everyone is "too polite" to point out when they think a bogus message has been submitted by some 14 year old kid playing on his computer. "Martha" is obviously just that.

JustJim



Country: USA | Posts: 80 Go to Top of Page

EuroTim
Forum Member


Posted - 08/15/2006 :  07:36:40 AM  Show Profile  Click to see EuroTim's MSN Messenger address  Send EuroTim a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
"This whole discussion seems highly bogus from the get-go. We're supposed to believe that "Martha's" rule for her daughter is: dress like a ho, or get kicked out of the house? Please. "Martha" writes more like a porn-happy middle-aged guy than a mother of an 18 year old daughter. I"m not buying it." AMEN !




Country: Italy | Posts: 194 Go to Top of Page

FireProf
Forum Member


Posted - 08/16/2006 :  01:36:46 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JustJim

The one thing that drives me nuts on this forum (and I enjoy most of it so I'm not being negative) is that everyone is "too polite" to point out when they think a bogus message has been submitted by some 14 year old kid playing on his computer. "Martha" is obviously just that.

JustJim



Does it really make sense to "go off" and be impolite, so to speak, at everyone else's expense? We are hoping that whoever wrote this read a few of the replies and knows they didn't fool anyone, so hopefully they'd stop posting and go play somewhere else.

It makes no sense to be abusive and durogatory just in case some real naturist newbie comes to visit and reads this stuff. We'd like them to think we're at least civil!



Country: USA | Posts: 3175 Go to Top of Page

JustJim
Forum Member


Posted - 08/16/2006 :  07:35:34 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Civil yes....mindlessly gulllible? I hope not.

JustJim



Country: USA | Posts: 80 Go to Top of Page

FireProf
Forum Member


Posted - 08/16/2006 :  6:22:15 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
[i]Originally posted by JustJim ....mindlessly gulllible? I hope not.

JustJim



I totally agree with you here. I didn't read or see any of this in the responding posts. Maybe you were just giving posters a heads up not to go in that direction.



Country: USA | Posts: 3175 Go to Top of Page

Rodders
Forum Member


Posted - 08/17/2006 :  12:55:19 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
12 responses (including mine previous) Marty! Well done.

Rod



Country: United Kingdom | Posts: 170 Go to Top of Page

leo 50
Forum Member


Posted - 08/17/2006 :  3:58:19 PM  Show Profile  Send leo 50 a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
why i don't post much here,i must say this:
that post of marthas daughter reads like a "pulp sex" book from the 50's and 60's. my daughters were taught the "body beautiful", not how to dress like a sunset strip hooker.
it's bogus.

if you reach for the stars ,you shall hold them in your hand.



Country: USA | Posts: 35 Go to Top of Page

Rodders
Forum Member


Posted - 08/17/2006 :  5:09:51 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well said Leo.

Rod



Country: United Kingdom | Posts: 170 Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic: Catholicism and nudism Topic Next Topic: No Topic Needed - Just Chatting - November 2007  
 New Topic |   Reply to Topic |   Printer Friendly
Next Page
Jump To:
Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches © 2002-2020 SUN Go To Top Of Page
This page was down to skin in 0.2 seconds.

 

General Rules and Terms of Service

Membership in the Nudist-Resorts.Org discussion forum is free, can be anonymous, and requires only a working email address. All email links to members are cloaked. You can disable your email link. Nude photos can be posted, if within our posting rules. No erotica, spam or solicitation is allowed here. References to sex or genitals in your username or profile will result in removal from the forum. Information and opinions regarding anything related to nudism are encouraged, including discussions concerning the confusion between nudism and eroticism if discussed maturely. All posts in this forum are moderated. Read our POSTING RULES here and here. All information appearing on this website is copyright and intellectual property of the Society for Understanding Nudism unless otherwise noted. The views expressed on these forums by participants are not necessarily representative of the Society for Understanding Nudism. Administrators reserve the right to delete anything outside the posting rules, or anything in their opinion not appropriate. To post, you must have cookies enabled and be at least 18 years of age.

Email the Webmaster | Legal Information

Copyright © 2002-2015 SUN - Society for Understanding Nudism
All Rights Reserved

Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000