Author |
Topic |
Admin
Forum Admin
|
Posted - 10/13/2008 : 7:18:09 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by balataf
What is the duration of this administrative banning?
Cheri was originally under a 30 day ban, but we reserve the right to extend that period if her supporters can't behave themselves while she's disciplined.
Melissa is permanently banned. Many members are banned in the course of administering this forum. We have regularly and without warning permanently banned anyone that posts sexual photos, posts sex links, or shows a compulsive focus on sex. We also reserve the right to ban anyone that posts abusive or hateful statements toward any person, or our organization itself. Melissa's mischaracterization of our policies was in our view from a malicious intent. Frankly, if that is how she feels about this forum there is no reason we should allow her to remain.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1888 |
|
|
jim19452
Forum Member
|
Posted - 10/13/2008 : 7:51:28 PM
|
"We have regularly and without warning permanently banned anyone that posts sexual photos, posts sex links, or shows a compulsive focus on sex."
This deceitful comment is unrelated to the discussion on this thread.
"We also reserve the right to ban anyone that posts abusive or hateful statements toward any person, or our organization itself. Melissa's mischaracterization of our policies was in our view from a malicious intent."
Admin, you are posting abusive and hateful statements. "Malicious intent?" You are malicious. You are a sick puppy.
Best Wishes, Jim
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 323 |
|
|
jim19452
Forum Member
|
Posted - 10/13/2008 : 9:26:37 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Admin
quote: Originally posted by balataf
What is the duration of this administrative banning?
Cheri was originally under a 30 day ban, but we reserve the right to extend that period if her supporters can't behave themselves while she's disciplined.
She is to be punished for my 'sins.' Your behavoir defines hate, defines cowardice and defines injustice.
Best Wishes, Jim
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 323 |
|
|
johninfla
Forum Member
|
Posted - 10/13/2008 : 10:59:42 PM
|
Once again guys, picture yourselves sitting in the sysop's living room having your discussions.
Would you behave, on the hoof, in a friend's house the way you may or may not have behaved here in the forums?
And if you behaved outside the guidelines, the clearly-stated guidlines, why would you expect otherwise than to be nicely asked to vacate the premises?
Many bbs users spout off about the First Amendment after violating house rules. These forums are not a public utility; a free interpretation of the First Amendment says that you are welcome to create your own bbs in the manner you see fit.
fwiw
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 24 |
|
|
NudeAl
Forum Member
|
Posted - 10/13/2008 : 11:32:27 PM
|
This is indeed a sad state of affairs. By banning persons of eminent nudist credentials you have shown poor judgement and a lack of character. This web site is no longer family oriented or perhaps that is overly naive of me to think that nudism is supposed to be a family affair. I see now that the major financial supporters of this site are displeased that their resort is now being painted in their true colors and that they don't seem to like it. To them I would say you can't have your cake and eat it too. Or if you prefer you made your bed now lie in it. If this site is no longer about family friendly nudism then I have no interest in being a part of it. If they want to promote an alternate hedonistic lifestyle then they should have the guts to come right out and say so. If we are not free to express our honest opinions then what use is it to post here at all? We should only post those comments we are prepared to defend in court? WTF!??? Are we in a court? Is that some sort of veiled threat an attempt to restrain the free exchange of ideas you don't like? Well screw that I am out of here!
The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep. -- Robert Frost
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 457 |
|
|
jim19452
Forum Member
|
Posted - 10/14/2008 : 6:03:40 PM
|
johninfla: "Would you behave, on the hoof, in a friend's house the way you may or may not have behaved here in the forums?"
Yes.
"And if you behaved outside the guidelines, the clearly-stated guidlines, why would you expect otherwise than to be nicely asked to vacate the premises?"
Nicely asked to vacate the premises? That was hate speech.
"Many bbs users spout off about the First Amendment after violating house rules. These forums are not a public utility; a free interpretation of the First Amendment says that you are welcome to create your own bbs in the manner you see fit."
I agree. But there is always the element of the "greatest good for the greatest number (Bregman?)" that should be considered. Cheri and Melissa were "good."
NudeAl "If we are not free to express our honest opinions then what use is it to post here at all? We should only post those comments we are prepared to defend in court? WTF!??? Are we in a court? Is that some sort of veiled threat an attempt to restrain the free exchange of ideas you don't like?"
Thanks NudeAl, It was a threat. I am blown away by ADMIN the weakling.
Best Wishes, Jim
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 323 |
|
|
Admin
Forum Admin
|
Posted - 10/14/2008 : 9:02:32 PM
|
To clarify the court reference: If you slander or libel any person or business, don't expect us to protect you if that party chooses to go after you in court. In fact, we'll assist them to insure you have your day before the judge. In this rare case we would not protect your privacy. Slander and libel are expressly prohibited here.
This is one of the reasons we prohibit resort bashing, since it usually originates with those that have no personal experience with the bashed resort, but are talking negatively about it regardless.
jim19452, you have demonstrated that you will not stop insulting the Admin for enforcing previously stated policies. We've allowed several days, and it doesn't look like your antagonism is temporary. We have to take the course of banning you permanently.
We hope this will not discourage polite discussion in this thread. We are not banning jim19452 for disagreeing, but for his abusive language and generally disruptive behavior. He has had a chance to say what he has chosen to say.
If anyone reading doesn't understand why we prohibit resort bashing, especially toward those resorts that offer a family friendly environment with some events for adults, please add your question by clicking Reply to Topic. It should be pretty clear from reading the previous posts in this thread which resorts and destinations we are willing to support. However, there is no reason to close this thread if everyone posts politely.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1888 |
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches |
© 2002-2020 SUN |
|
|
|