| Author |
 Topic  |
|
papabare
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/26/2004 : 7:17:27 PM
|
Lets all travel to Scandinavia too! Hey we should do a world nude trip :)
--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 620 |
 |
|
|
nudeguy
Forum Member
|
 Posted - 03/26/2004 : 7:58:15 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by nudeisntlewd
Kim and nudeguy, of that I have no doubt. Just as soon as somebody tries it, the lawmakers would be all over it. The thread about funny and obsolete laws is filled with laws that nobody abolished, because it's a waste of time and money to do so, when nobody violates them.
Randy 
You got that right, Randy. Just because there's no STATE law prohibiting nudity, that doesn't prevent local jurisdications from passing their own.
That happened in my state of Pennsylvania, in the city of Erie. Pennsylvania has no state law on the books preventing women from going topless in public.  State laws here only prohibit the public display of male or female genitals. The knotheads in Erie's city council decided to ban exposure of female breasts in public within that city, except for nursing a baby which they so generously allowed.
New York is the only U.S. state I know which guarantees women equal topfree rights as men. Even so, I never hear of women walking around topless in NY. Does anyone have knowledge of other states which have a similar law?
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 126 |
|
|
|
Kimberly
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/26/2004 : 10:20:45 PM
|
Welcome to the forum baremeg. Isn't Scandinavia where naturism started?
Kim =^.^=
|
|
Country: Canada
| Posts: 3235 |
|
|
|
ncognito
New Member
|
Posted - 03/26/2004 : 11:59:41 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by nudeguy
Also I'm told that carrying a firearm without a permit is legal in Vermont. That might present a problem for a nudist. Where does one hide the darn thing?
Maybe I'm better off NOT using my imagination! 
Actually you don't need to hide it, it's perfectly legal to wear it outside your clothes
Common looking people are the best in the world..that is the reason the Lord makes so many of them.
Abraham Lincoln
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 5 |
|
|
|
irishred
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/27/2004 : 08:17:17 AM
|
Baremeg and ncognito, welcome to the forum.
irishred
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 880 |
|
|
|
Dave
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/27/2004 : 08:46:25 AM
|
 That's great but you only have a 3 day window where it is warm enough to go nude!!!
Dave...
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 173 |
|
|
|
Baremeg
New Member
|
Posted - 03/27/2004 : 5:43:37 PM
|
:-)))
baremeg
|
|
Country: Norway
| Posts: 2 |
|
|
|
nudeguy
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/27/2004 : 6:10:44 PM
|
Sounds about right, Dave! 
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 126 |
|
|
|
Kimberly
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/27/2004 : 8:21:16 PM
|
Okay fill me in, why does someone need to carry a fire arm down the street?
Kim =^.^=
|
|
Country: Canada
| Posts: 3235 |
|
|
|
papabare
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/28/2004 : 11:33:20 AM
|
Just incase the Nazi's come! You never know! ;)
--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 620 |
|
|
|
nudeguy
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/28/2004 : 5:58:10 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kimberly
Okay fill me in, why does someone need to carry a fire arm down the street?
Kim =^.^=
I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion on gun rights, but I will try to answer Kim's question.
While I don't do this myself, a few very good friends of mine who are totally law-abiding, good people would not think of leaving home without toting a concealed firearm. Of course they have carry permits, so everything is legal. The answer to Kim's question is that a person will hopefully never NEED to carry a firearm. But even while we hope for the best, one never knows when he or she MIGHT need to draw a firearm to defend oneself or a loved one against the criminal element. Unless you've ever had to live or work in a high-crime urban area, or ever been robbed, raped, or brutally assaulted, it may be difficult to understand the rationale to carry a firearm for self-defense. Crime victims tend to not want to be victimized again. It comes down to one question: Whose life is more valuable, yours or that of the criminal who has made a career out of hurting or killing other human beings?
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 126 |
|
|
|
sailordave
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/28/2004 : 6:12:14 PM
|
Because criminals fear people who carry guns. The national news doesn't like to cover stories about people who saved either their life or the lives of others using a gun they legally purchased and registered. When places like England took away people's guns, deaths and crimes by guns increased because the people who obey the laws no longer had guns to defend themselves and the criminals continued to be criminals and got and used guns. One police chief, when asked by a reporter what could be done to reduce crime, said to arm all lawabiding citizens. The mayor, governor, and reporters didn't like this answer even though it was the truth. Only two reasons why I don't have one myself. First is trailer park rules, but there are ways around those rules especiallys since they can't search my home. Second is money. Guns aren't exactly cheap. Unlike some in my family, I wouldn't care about having a gun with the "biggest or longest barrel". Give me a small .22 caliber hand gun. Easy to aim, low recoil, easy to use in a confined space, and easy to conceal.
quote:
Originally posted by Kimberly
Okay fill me in, why does someone need to carry a fire arm down the street?
Kim =^.^=
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 388 |
|
|
|
Kimberly
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/29/2004 : 03:21:36 AM
|
Thanks foe the input guys, that is a great help. I just hope it doesn't ever get that bad here.
Kim =^.^=
|
|
Country: Canada
| Posts: 3235 |
|
|
|
Revilo42
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/29/2004 : 2:58:31 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kimberly
David;
1066 was when William the Conquerer invaded England. The Magna Carter was signed by King John at Runnymede in 1215 under considerable duress. Just a little history trivia.
Oops! I was thinking of the Domesday book in 1085> Bill the Conk basically said he would keep the old (English) laws in place, and recognised the authority of the Mayor of London (a position which ran uninterupted until Margeret Thatcher!)
Cheers!
David
www.thebeadman.net
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 96 |
|
|
|
Revilo42
Forum Member
|
Posted - 03/29/2004 : 3:02:27 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kimberly
Okay fill me in, why does someone need to carry a fire arm down the street?
Obviously, so an upright citizen can shoot anyone breaking the law by going nude 
Cheers!
David
www.thebeadman.net
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 96 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches |
© 2002-2020 SUN |
|
|
|
WALKING DOWN THE STREET NAKED....IT'S LEGAL
